Month: June 2017

Tanzania: The Sad Tales of Tanzanian Leather Workers

ANALYSIS

Fadhili Mbwambo was among people who participated in last year’s Dar es Salaam International Trade Fair (DITF) famously known as saba saba. He didn’t participate as a shopper but as an exhibitor. It was an opportunity for him to promote his leather products.

The 37-year-old shoemaker says, “The 2016 fair was a good opportunity for I not only sold my products but I also received many business orders. Unfortunately I could not take all the orders due to lack of capacity to produce shoes in large quantities.”

The father of two does not have the required machines to help him produce enough shoes in a short time. He met a Kenyan trader during the trade fair who wanted to buy a large quantity of shoes but unfortunately, Mbwambo could not manage without modern shoe making machines.

“The Kenyan trader asked me if I was capable of making 100 pairs of shoes every day, but I was not in the position to do so,” Mbwambo recalls sadly. To him, this was an opportunity to penetrate the Nairobi market.

Using rudimentary tools at his workshop in Tabata-Aroma in Ilala District, Mbwambo can only make 30 pairs a day. To produce 100 pairs or more in a day, he needs a minimum of Sh10 million to buy the required machines.

“I can’t afford a leather cutting machine that costs Sh5 million, a shoes sewing machine that costs Sh3 million and a shoe sole pressing machine which is available for Sh2 million,” he says.

His main tools are a hammer, a pair of scissors, a knife and a shoe needle.

Apart from selling the shoes to ordinary customers, Mbwambo also receives orders from institutions such as the Agha Khan Hospital for staff shoes, a security company based in Dar es Salaam and some schools. He receives many school orders in January and June.

A long the Bima-Kimanga road is another shoemaker, Francis Adrian. As you approach his shoe factory, a mere three square metres room, one can hear the sound of a water pumping machine. The machine goes on and off several times before it finally comes to a stop. Then Adrian appears holding a pair of sandals. He tells me that he was using the water pumping machine to level the rough surface of the new sandals he has made.

“I use the rotating part of this water pump to make the rough surface of shoes or sandals smooth. I do so to make them look nice and attractive. I use the water pump because I cannot afford a shoe roughing machine ,” says Adrian.

Apart from using outdated technology in making shoes and sandals, the 42-year-old Adrian says the high cost of importing raw materials is another factor that is hindering the growth of the industry.

Unlike most shoe makers who learn the trade from older folks, Adrian received partial training from the United Nation’s Industry Development Organisation (UNIDO) in 2004 before dropping out due to illness. Adrian is concerned that despite the rise in the price of raw materials, the price of shoes has remained the same over the years. In 2004, when he started his small factory in Gongo la Mboto, in Ilala District, one square foot of leather cost Sh1,600. The price has gone up to Sh3,000 today.

“The wholesale price of a pair of sandals still stands at Sh8,000 today and Sh10,000 retail price.” The reason, he says is because Tanzanians prefer buying imported shoes than locally made ones. This is why shoemakers keep the price constant as a way of attracting customers.

A pair of shoe sole sells at Sh10,000 which is up from the Sh6, 000 old price. “The soles are usuallly imported from China,” says Adrian.

Like Mbwambo, Adrian, too can only produce 30 pairs maximum in a day. The reason? Poor technology and low capital.

The training challenge

When Mbwambo left Same District in Kilimanjaro Region to come to Dar es Salaam in 2002, he had no idea that shoe making would be his way of earning a living.

For nearly a decade, he worked as an assistant to a relative who used to own a small shoe making factory. His relative had trained at Peramiho Vocational Training Centre in Ruvuma Region.

“He used to run a small factory at Magomeni and so I used to help him with work for nearly 10 years. In the process, I too learnt how to make shoes,” he says.

Adrian too learnt the trade on the job. He used to help a friend at Manzese with work and earned a little money. He later attended UNIDO’s shoe making training which he could not complete. Adrian who has trained his two younger brothers to make shoes says most shoemakers in Dar es Salaam never attended formal training but they learnt from small factories like his. School fees becomes a hindrance most of the time.

Adrian’s younger brother, 31-year-old Xavery appeals to government to support shoe makers so they can compete in the East African market. He says as small -scale shoe makers they do not qualify for bank loans as they do not meet the conditions such as collateral.

EAC market potential

Mbwambo is among the 150 members of Tanzania Leather Products Producers Association (TALEPPA) who are likely to miss the opportunity to compete in the East African Community (EAC) market especially now that plans are under way to ban importation of second hand goods and leather products from overseas countries.

The ban aims to boost local manufacturing sectors in the region that will consequently increase job opportunities. To benefit from the ban, local leather products producers need capital to meet market demand.

Last year, the EAC community that now has six member states of Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and South Sudan, declared that by the end of 2019 there will be no importation of textile and shoes from outside EAC. Member States will be required to buy such goods or products within the market comprising of 150 million people.

The decision is underpinned by EAC common market protocol that guides, “the free movement of goods, people, labour, services and capital from one partner state to another as well as the rights of establishment and residence without restrictions.”

Despite the favourable decision, local shoemakers believe lack of capital, outdated technology and inadequate skills may hinder their penetration to the market. These, they say need to be addressed fast.

TALEPPA Secretary, Timothy Futo says with capital, TALEPPA members can equally compete with other producers in the EAC as they are capable of producing high quality products. He says it is difficult for local shoemakers to afford machines worth between Sh12 million and Sh30 million.

“Government should connect leather product producers with financial institutions or firms that make or supply machines so they can access loans easily,” he suggests.

If government invests in the sector, Futo believes it will help create a lot of jobs. He says government should build shoe factories including those manufacturing soles which are currently imported.

He points out that China products are killing the efforts of small-scale shoemakers. “While the Chinese counterparts are using advanced technology to produce quality products in large quantities, it’s a different story for Tanzanian shoemakers. Yet you expect them to compete in the same market.”

TALEPPA leader opined that the EAC decision to ban importation of leather products will benefit the sector only if government empowers local shoemakers to cover the anticipated deficit of leather products in the market. “Government should motivate all Tanzanians to love and use locally-made products.”

A light at the end of the tunnel

While shoemakers claim that government is not doing enough to empower them to compete in the local and East African markets, the Small Industry Development Organisation (Sido) director general, Prof Sylvester Mpanduji refutes the claim. He says government provides an enabling environment for accessing individual or group loans to purchase shoe machines.

“Yes, there are challenges in getting machines but we insist that they visit our offices to access low interest loans of a maximum of Sh5 million per individual,” says Prof Mpanduji. He adds that if someone needs from Sh10 million to Sh50 million, Sido can always link them to CRDB bank.

Other roles of Sido according to the director, include consultancy and training services to strengthen the competitive ability of small-scale industries.

Prof Mpanduji says in an effort to cut down unemployment, the Ministry of State in the Prime Minister’s Office responsible for policy, parliament, work, youth, employment and the disabled in collaboration with Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology has trained 1,000 youth on how to make leather products in Mwanza.

He calls upon established businesses to invest in shoemaking industries as the country is geared towards industrial economy.

The Prisons Department too in collaboration with the Parastatal Pensions Fund is constructing a new shoe factory at Karanga Prison in Moshi, Kilimanjaro. The factory that will use locally sourced raw materials will be completed by 2018.

Zimbabwe: ‘Leave Our Land and Go Play Golf’, Mugabe Loyalist Tells White Farmers

Zanu-PF youth leader Kudzi Chipanga has reportedly urged Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe to eject all remaining commercial white farmers in the country’s Manicaland province, saying they should relocate to Harare’s leafy Borrowdale suburb “where they can relax and play golf”.

According to New Zimbabwe.com, Chipanga said this during a rally that was also addressed by Mugabe on Friday in Mutare.

Chipanga said most Zanu-PF party youths remained landless even after the country’s controversial land reforms.

Thousands of white commercial farmers and their employees were displaced and left without sources of income during the fast-tracked agrarian reforms that were masterminded by Mugabe’s administration in 2000.

Fresh land grabs

“President, whites are not superior and you once told us that a good white man is one who is asleep.

“Whites are not superior; it’s time they totally vacate the farms and find a place somewhere in the leafy suburbs of Borrowdale where they can relax and play golf whilst youths take the opportunity to farm their own country,” Chipanga was quoted as saying.

Chipanga’s utterances came just a few weeks after Mugabe threatened to embark on fresh land grabs targeting the few white commercial farmers still remaining in the country.

Addressing thousands of his ruling Zanu-PF party supporters in the farming town of Marondera two weeks ago, the nonagenarian said white commercial agronomists who still remained on the farms should be removed from their properties because most Zimbabweans were in need of land.

Said Mugabe: “We are going to take those farms and re-distribute them to our youths, some of whom did not benefit from the land reform programme but the land would not be enough for everybody. We are also going to take away the land from small scale purchase farmers who are not utilising those farms for re-distribution.”

News24

Kenya: Teacher Administrators Reap Big From New Salaries Deal

Teachers in administrative positions are the major beneficiaries of a salary increase whose implementation will start on July 1.

An analysis of the implementation schedule that was signed on Friday between the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) and union leaders indicate that, a teacher in administrative position currently taking home Sh16, 692 as basic salary will earn Sh62,272 at the end of four years.

These include head teacher, deputy head teacher I and senior master III.

Teachers in this category which is Job Group G to M and to be now known as C5 earn between Sh16, 692 and Sh50, 840.

FULLY IMPLEMENTED

In four years time, they will all be earning between Sh62, 272 to Sh64,631 once the increase has been fully implemented.

In the first phase for instance, a teacher in administrative position earning Sh16,692 will earn Sh29,427 which is almost double.

The analysis also indicate that lowest paid teacher with no administrative duties will now get Sh21,756 up from Sh16,692 while Chief Principal will earn Sh157,656 up from Sh144,928 per month exclusive of allowances.

This means that the lowest paid teacher will get an increase of Sh5,064 in two years while highest paid will get Sh12,692 in four years.

CHIEF PRINCIPALS

“Chief principals currently in Job Group R (D5) in the first phase will earn an increase of Sh3,432, second phase Sh4577 while in third phase they will get Sh4,719.

The lowest paid chief principal who currently earns Sh109,089 will now get Sh131,380 an increase of Sh22,291,” indicates the plan.

The highest paid chief principal in job group Q who currently takes home Sh120,270 will get Sh131,380 an increase of Sh11,110 while lowest paid chief principal currently earning Sh89,748 will earn Sh131,380 an increase of Sh41,632.

“For senior principals job group P (D4), the highest paid who takes home Sh103,894 will earn Sh121,890 an increase of Sh17,996.

The lowest paid who gets Sh77,527 will now get Sh118,242 an increase of Sh40,715,” it adds.

INCREASE OF SH25,751

Principals in job group M(D3, the highest who earns Sh55,840 will now get Sh104,644 an increase of Sh48,804 while lowest currently getting Sh41,590 will get Sh104,644 an increase of Sh63,054.

Principals in job group M(D3, the highest who earn Sh55,840 will now get Sh104,644 which translates to an increase of Sh42,857 while the highest paid who earn Sh65,290 will get Sh91,041 an increase of Sh25,751.

For senior head teachers, senior master II and deputy principals IV, the highest paid in job group M(D1) will earn Sh77,840 up from Sh55,840 while the lowest paid will earn Sh77,840 up from Sh41,590.

HEAD TEACHER

Those in Job Group N(D1)currently earning Sh48,190 will also get Sh77,840 while highest currently earning Sh65,290 will get Sh85,269.

In the head teacher, deputy head teacher and senior master III category, those in job group G(C5) currently earning Sh16,692 will get Sh62,272 while those in the same group earning Sh21,304 will take home Sh62,272.

Deputy head teacher II under C4 will also have their salaries tripled from Sh16,692 to Sh52,308.

A secondary school teacher I and senior teacher I currently earning between Sh35,910 and Sh45,880 will now get between Sh43,154 and Sh53,943.

SENIOR TEACHER

For senior teacher II ,secondary teacher II , secondary teacher II UT and primary special need education teacher in job group C2 , their salaries will be increased from Sh34,955. Currently they earn between Sh16,692 and Sh29,918.

Secondary teacher II and secondary teacher II UT and primary special need education teachers in job group K(C2) currently earns between Sh31,020 and Sh41,590 and will now earn between Sh34,955 and Sh43,694.

Primary teacher I and secondary teacher III who fall in job group H and J(C1) currently earning between Sh19,323 and 29,918 will get Sh27,195 and Sh33,994 in two years time.

Primary teacher II in job group G(B5) currently earning Sh16,692 to Sh21,304 will get between Sh21,756 and Sh27,195 in two years period.

LOWER CADRES

More than 152,000 teachers fall in lower cadres and their pay will be implemented in two phases.

The Sh54 billion salary increase deal will benefit 305,000 teachers across the country and will run until June 30, 2021. The agreement also abolished the P1 teacher position.

Kenya National Union of teachers (Knut) and Kenya Union of Post Primary Education Teachers signed the deal on behalf of teachers while TSC chairperson Lydia Nzomo signed on behalf of the commission.

Knut secretary-general Wilson Sossion said the deal is the best for teachers.

WINDING JOURNEY

“The matrix is as a result of winding journey that involved far and wide consultations and exhaustive negotiations,” said Mr Sossion.

He warned that the union will not entertain barriers created by Salaries and Remuneration Commission in future negotiations.

The worth of every job will be determined based on the category, size of school and level of responsibility.

NEW STRUCTURE

The new structure has grades B5, C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5. Previously, teachers were graded in Job Group G, H, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q and R.

Primary and post-primary teachers in non-administrative positions have been moved from Grade B5 (former Job Group H) to D1 (formerly P).

Primary school administrators will be appointed substantively and placed in grade C2 (formerly K) to D1 (formerly P).

South Africa: Cape Town Dam Levels Rise By 3.7 Percent Following Recent Rains

The City of Cape Town on Monday warned residents to curb water consumption, saying recent rains had done little to elevate the ongoing drought.

On Monday afternoon, the city’s storage dam levels stood at 23.1%, an increase of 3.7%, following recent rains.

With the last 10% of a dam’s water mostly being unusable, dam levels are effectively at 13.1%.

The mayoral committee member for informal settlements, water and waste services and energy, Councillor Xanthea Limberg, in a statement said that residents should still use less than 100l per person per day.

“Apart from safeguarding our current sustainability, we must think about building additional reserve capacity by continuing with the most hard-hitting water-saving efforts that we can muster,” Limberg said.

“It may take a few seasons of normal rainfall for the dams to recover and we must bear in mind that we are expecting an even tougher summer in 2018.”

Citywide consumption increased by 25 million litres per day and was 40 million litres above the target of 600 million litres per day, by Monday, June 12.

Meanwhile, Mayor Patricia de Lille said she had instructed city officials to divest from fossil fuel assets and companies in favour of greener and cleaner investments.

“We are going to instruct investors looking after our money not to put our money into fossil fuel-related companies, or for it to be used to fund the development of dirty and unsustainable projects,” she said in a statement.

“We want our investments to be aligned with our principles of resilience and sustainability.”

Source: News24

Uganda: Electricity Firm On the Spot Over Breach of Contract

A report seen by Saturday Monitor has revealed that Eskom Uganda Limited (EUL) is not living up to the terms of the 20-year concession it signed with Uganda Electricity Generation Company Limited (UEGCL) about 15 years ago.

The report, which reviewed the performance of the South African electricity company was prepared by UEGCL at the close of last year.

It indicates that EUL is transferring money out of the country without reinvesting it into the power plant, contrary to the conditions of the concession.

However, in a detailed response, Eskom contests the findings of the report, saying on the contrary, everything possible has been done to implement the Concession and Assignment Agreement (CAA) to the letter.

The 2002 CAA signed between UEGCL and EUL requires the South African electricity company to maintain and operate Kiira and Nalubaale hydroelectric power stations for a period of 20 years.

The two power dams, located in Jinja, eastern Uganda, generate a combined capacity of 380MW.

But findings of the report reveal a number of shortages, key among which include the failure to run the 15 key units in the complex. Only 13 are fully operational, which negatively impact on power generation capacity and availability.

The report also shows that there is currently no plan to conduct remedial works on the Nalubaale Power House despite recommendations from various studies.

According to the report, maintenance of critical equipment is also lacking with some failing to work normally, compromising the safety of the plant.

For instance, the report says, the switchyard computer, compressed air system and 110 VDC battery bank, all at the Kiira Power Station, have been badly maintained and are currently facing the risk of failing.

“EUL has performed satisfactorily from the production side; however, performance in respect to maintenance of the plant(s) is below expectation,” the report prepared by UEGCL management late last year, reads in part.

“This in itself points to the fact that Eskom has not fully complied with the CAA objective of restoring and maintaining the plant for posterity of the asset life, and there is an imminent threat of handing over (after the concession has expired) a derelict plant at the end of the concession,” the report further reads.

While reviewing the investment injected in operation and maintenance between 2003 and 2015, the report reveals that Eskom has invested less than it should have, contrary to the requirements of the concession.

According to the review of the performance report, operation and maintenance cost into the power complex averages at about Shs5.3b per year, which is about 33 per cent less than the manpower cost.

UEGCL, which owns the two plants on behalf of government, believes that the operation and maintenance budget of the two complexes should be in the region of Shs14b at the very least.

Therefore, the report suggests, it has been difficult for the Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) and UEGCL to determine what constitutes investment because there has not been clear and agreed terms of reference to guide the two stakeholders.

For the meantime, however, Eskom continues to make profits with declining revenues that could be a result of low investment in operation and maintenance.

The report also reveals that there could be no investment originating from the Eskom Uganda parent company, considering it has been facing challenges back home.

This, the report reveals, has forced Eskom to rely on a business model that rotates around saving money and making profit from the operation and maintenance.

“The concession of the state-owned asset has not substantially improved. UEGCL feels that now is time to commence preparation to take over the management of the plant as capacity is built within the sector to manage its assets, and reduce on pilferage of assets,” part of the report says.

The general breach of the CAA, according to the report, puts the two dams at risk yet there is no sufficient evidence to suggest that Eskom can within the remaining six years of the concession come good on its promise as agreed in the concession.

Regulator’s take

When contacted last week, the owners of the two power complexes on behalf of the government had this to say: “It is true UEGCL’s mandate includes monitoring the performance of the operation and maintenance regime at Nalubaale and Kiira hydro power complex. Matters arising out of the performance monitoring are addressed in accordance with the CAA.”

The UEGCL adds: “Indeed remedial and mitigation measures are clearly spelt out. Failure to heed the asset owners (UEGCL) recommendations and findings have reprimands which are also clearly spelt out in the CAA.”

The statement issued by the UEGCL corporate affairs manager, Mr Simon Kasyate, also quoted the acting UEGCL chief executive officer, Mr David Isingoma, as saying: “We can authoritatively say that the issues you are referring to are being handled in accordance with agreed procedures. We remain unwavering in our execution of this cardinal mandate and as such, take the assurance that we are and have been doing our best to ensure proper asset care and management of the Nalubaale/Kiira hydro Power complex.”

On Wednesday, the ERA principal communications officer, Mr Julius Wandera, told Saturday Monitor that they have not seen the report (EUL performance review) yet.

He said: “I cannot comment because I am not aware about that report. And even then I will have to internally verify it before saying anything. But at the moment I am not aware about such a report.”

Eskom reacts

In a written response to questions from this newspaper, Eskom said all its operation and maintenance activities are highly regulated and approved on an annual basis by ERA, Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL) and UEGCL.

“We are operating as per the guidelines within the CAA and indeed we have consistently met our obligation,” reads part of the statement.

The statement further said the complex is comprised of 15 units, 10 at Nalubaale and five at Kiira power station. And that all the five units at Kiira are fully operational. The two units, three and 10 at Nalubaale, are currently undergoing extensive overhaul and the company expects to bring unit three back to operation by the end of the year.

“High level engineering works are involved as the entire unit is dismantled up to the turbine. Both overhauls were for improving performance of the units and were duly approved by both UEGCL and ERA,” the statement reads.

Escom said a technical plan approved for the period 2015-2018 by both ERA and UEGCL was in place, and that it is reviewed annually “in line with current landscape and again approved by both UEGCL and ERA”.

On maintenance of key installations, Eskom said although they recognise that all equipment at the plant requires regular maintenance and replacement, “we have prioritised all our technical interventions based on our robust engineering risk assessment, and indeed the prioritisation also involves consultation and approval of the asset owner and the regulator.”

Regarding operation and maintenance cost, Eskom wrote: “We don’t know the basis where these figures (in the report) were derived from. Our maintenance cost budget is approved by ERA based on the agreed upon outage plan (maintenance programme) by both UETCL and UEGCL. Prior to ERA’s approval, the costs were scrutinised and benchmarked and found to be reasonable in line with the needs of the plant and tariff considerations of the country.”

The company, in response to the charge that it is not investing enough, said it “is a puzzle to note that we scale down on maintenance to do more investments, at the same time, we are seen not to do investments and remain profitable.

Escom added: “Our revenue is determined by ERA and it includes many parameters that can be well explained by the regulator because not all such parameters are within our control. Notwithstanding, EUL is a profitable company based on its efficient operations and investments.”

On the accusation that Escom’s parent company has not been supporting Escom financially, Escom Uganda wrote: “The parent company has been supportive right from the start of the concession where we had to meet all the investment obligations as stipulated by the licence agreement and will continue to deliver their support as they are the custodian of the company’s funding plan.”

Escom added that its annual maintenance plan, which is agreed upon by UETCL and UEGCL and approved by ERA, has been “executed consistently over the years.”

Escom said: “It should also be noted that the Concession Agreement requires us to hand over the plant in an operable condition. Aware of this obligation, our maintenance philosophy and investment plan are geared towards this and to date over $20 million (about Shs72 billion) have been invested and additional $25 million (about Shs90 billion) will be invested in the next five years.”

To sum it up, Escom argued: “We operate in a highly regulated sector which has a direct influence and impact to our only customer, who is also the system operator (UETCL) to whom we sell the power in line with the power purchase agreement and the regulator (ERA) who regulates our operations in line with our generation licence.”

Background

Eskom Uganda took over operations and maintenance of the power generation complex from UEGCL in April 2003 after being awarded a 20-years concession. The concession is now left with about five-six-years to run out. Before then the complex was being managed by UEGCL.

The senior management of the South African electricity company about two months ago in Jinja told President Museveni that more than $2 million (about Shs72.3b) has been invested here to date in upgrading systems and equipment at the power plant.

They also told the President that Eskom intends to invest an additional $25 million (about Shs90 billion) in the remaining period of the concession in upgrades and new systems to sustain electricity availability.

Tanzania: JPM Praise Motion Exposes Parliament’s Two Faces

Dar es Salaam — When it comes to self-serving antics, no one beats MPs, who demonstrated exactly that in Dodoma on Wednesday.

Never in the business of missing make-up and re branding opportunities, the MPs sought to get a cake of the current wind of patriotism sweeping across the country over President John Magufuli’s standup against mining giant, Acacia.

The public watched and listened yesterday as the august House endorsed a motion to congratulate President Magufuli for his bold steps to push for the country’s better bidding in the mining agreements.

The motion was moved, debated and passed in the usual manner, with the majority of the ruling party MPs cheering it through while the opposition pulled the other way.

But to many independent analysts, it will not be lost that however well intended the motion was, it was in the same fashion, and in Parliament arrangement that politicians endorsed the same laws that President Magufuli is seeking to reverse. Some of the politicians have lived through the motions over the years as the people’s representatives.

It will therefore not be surprising that yesterday’s decision to side with President Magufuli to clear rot in the mining sector that has cost the nation billions of shilling in loses is likely to raise questions as to the sincerity of the institution to serve public interest that outlives individual and party selfish interests.

Apart from endorsing the motion, the MPs also called for stern action against officials implicated in mishandling mining contracts and administrative faults that cost the nation.

The passing of the mining laws by the CCM-dominated parliament some 20 years ago is blamed for giving foreign mining companies a leeway to unfairly exploit the country’s mineral wealth.

The subsequent actions by the lawmakers to turn down any efforts from within and outside Parliament to overhaul the mining regime over the years will certainly call to question their new-found commitment.

Observers yesterday’s resolution in one way or another exposes their collective failure to stand for matters of national interest for many years.

Questions abound why some individuals who crafted and enacted exploitative mining laws and punished fellow MPs who ceaselessly called for their review now put up a brave face.

“Parliament’s decision to pass a motion to support the president’s stance smacks of hypocrisy,” said the acting Director of Legal Human Rights Commission (LHRC), Ms Anna Henga, likening the MPs to a flag which blows with the wind.

She said this was not the first time such an investigation was done on minerals, citing a 2014 LHRC report on the same which was submitted to Parliament but was not take seriously.

CCM’s Ideology and Publicity, Mr Humphrey Polepole, yesterday said he would not comment on reactions by the MPs, saying the real story was on the meeting that President Magufuli held yesterday with the Barrick Gold boss.

“Today (yesterday) President Magufuli met with Prof John Thornton, Chairman of Barrick Gold Canada, which is the largest shareholder of Acacia Mining. The firm has pledged to compensate the nation and build a smelter. To me, that is the greatest news for the nation,” he said.

He said 275 MPs from CCM who forms 60 per cent of MPs in the current Parliament are new representatives and were not in Parliament when the bad laws were being passed. “The fact that the mining company has agreed to compensate Tanzania the loss that it incurred for the past years is something historic in Tanzania,” he said.

Tanzanians recall the rush in 1997 in Parliament to pass the mineral sector laws that become enormously favourable to foreign mining companies.

The laws provided incentive and exemption like income tax, valued added tax, fuel levy and customs duty for mining companies and their contractors.

At that time, MPs waste no time to scrutinize the laws that allowed 100 per cent ownership of minerals and mines to foreign corporations, effectively barring the government from entering into new joint ventures. The laws also granted that they could repatriate all their profit.

Parliament suppress own voice

The most vivid example of substantive weakness of Parliament as an institution to effectively serve the public interest was the its decision in August 2007 to suspend opposition parliamentarian Zitto Kabwe after he proposed a government investigation into the signing of anew mining agreement without parliament’s role.

The CCM-dominated MPs unanimously rejected Zitto Kabwe’s call which culminated into his suspension for several months. Numerous other such efforts in the House were either defeated on the floor or killed beforehand the MPs.

In July 2015, about 32 opposition MPs were ejected from the August House following protests against the rush by the government to table three crucial bills on oil and gas. The opposition and other group outside the assembly wanted the tabling shelved until after the 2015 elections.

The opposition accused Speaker of the national assembly of abusing power, saying they were not ready to take part in a flawed process that would set the nation on the path to a resource curse.

MPs turn deaf ear on commission

The government has from time to time bowed to public pressure and formed several commissions to probe loopholes in the mining regime and proposed ways of ensuring Tanzania fully benefit from her mineral wealth. Not less than 10 commissions and committees have been formed in the past but whose outcomes were largely shelved.

The Bomani commission that was formed by President Jakaya Kikwete was by far the deepest of all and recommended sweeping changes to turn around the sector.

However, Parliament is accused of failing to take opportunity from the work of those commissions to pressure government for the desired changes in mining laws. It is the same government that repeatedly refused to make mining agreements public to elected representatives that the MPs are celebrating its actions.

Nigeria: NCC’s Fine Not Responsible for Sack of 259 Employees – MTN

Abuja — Telecommunications firm, MTN yesterday said the disengagement of 259 employees had nothing to do with the N1.04 trillion fine imposed on it by the Nigeria Communication Commission (NCC).

The fine was reduced to N330 billion after negotiations with the NCC, is to be paid by installments within three years.

MTN’s Acting Head of Corporate Services, Mrs. Oyeronke Oyetunde who appeared before the Saheed Akinade-Fijabi led House of Representatives committee on Telecommunications, explained that the workers were disengaged after MTN’s operations went digital.

Oyetunde was responding to a question by Diri Douye (PDP Bayelsa) about insinuations that MTN embarked on the disengagements after the NCC sanctioned it last year.

She told members of the committee probing the job and revenue losses in the telecom sector that MTN had 1,493 workers with 15 expatriates while 356 workers were disengaged last year.

She added that 194 of the employees left voluntarily while 65 others were relieved at management’s discretion.

“MTN had always outsourced its call centres over the years and had already commenced the process of recruiting between 100 -150 workers of the targeted 240 new intakes that could fit into its digital operations.

But dissatisfied with the explanation that some of the disengaged workers left voluntarily, the committee directed the MTN official to make available an inventory of all the disengaged workers to enable them ascertain their mode of exit to substantiate the claim.

A member of the committee, Nnenna Elendu-Ekeje (PDP Abia) enjoined MTN to suggest ways to galvanize the telecommunications sector to avert further job losses and boost revenue for the government.

Meanwhile, Airtel’s Director of Human Resources, Gbemiga Owolabi, in his submission disclosed that 90 workers left the company last year, adding that 60 others resigned voluntarily, six exited due to unethical practices while 14 others were disengaged.

South Africa’s Power Utility – So Many Red Flags It’s Hard to Know Where to Start

ANALYSIS

South Africa’s state owned enterprises have been hit by one scandal after another signalling serious political and corporate governance failures. The largest of these, the power utility Eskom, has seen its CEO Brian Molefe resign, then return, and then be fired – all in the space of seven months. This was followed by the unexpected resignation of Eskom Chairperson Ben Ngubane. The Conversation Africa’s Sibonelo Radebe asked Owen Skae to make sense of it all.

What do you make of what’s happening at Eskom?

It’s an unholy mess. The entire basis of the departure, reappointment and subsequent firing of the Eskom CEO raises so many red flags it’s hard to know where to start. And, to cap it all, the chairman has resigned with immediate effect. That means Eskom is without a CEO and now has a stand-in chairperson.

One thing is clear. The board, the chairperson Ben Ngubane, the minister of public enterprises Lynne Brown, and Molefe failed in their duties to serve Eskom. They failed South Africa’s taxpayers who are the indirect shareholders of Eskom. And they failed the country.

To understand their duties, one has to consider the basic principles of governing state owned enterprises. Eskom is a public company and its sole shareholder is the government. The shareholder representative is the ministry of public enterprises. A shareholder compact guides the relationship between the board, the executives and the minister.

The shareholder compact is an annual agreement between Eskom’s leadership and the minister. It documents the power utility’s mandate, as well as key performance measures. It also sets out what’s expected from a good governance perspective. It’s meant to avoid the kind of mess that has visited Eskom over the past few months.

What went wrong?

A number of things.

The main one is that corporate governance rules designed to manage conflicts of interest were totally disregarded.

The country’s Companies Act spells out what a director may or may not do if they have a personal financial interest in a matter. These rules apply as much to state owned enterprises as they do to publicly listed ones. The Eskom situation suggests that directors, and Molefe in particular, disregarded this principle.

This is highlighted in the former public protector Thuli Madonsela’s “State of Capture” report which suggested that Molefe had had an improper relationship with the Guptas, a family of businessmen with close ties to President Jacob Zuma. Among other things, the report questioned the way in which the Eskom leaders collaborated with the Guptas to buy, some say hijack, a mine supplying power utility with coal.

The Eskom board and the minister also failed to apply their minds properly around Molefe’s controversial departure and return. This includes a deal to give him a pension payout of R30 million just 18 months in the job and 13 years before he is due to reach retirement age.

A good understanding of the act, as well as the codes of good corporate governance that have been developed in the country, make it clear that the board should have:

  • called a special meeting to consider Molefe’s departure
  • applied its mind to the circumstances of his departure
  • ensured that the necessary legal, risk and reputation issues were addressed.

Another big area of failure was the role of the board’s chairperson. Even though he has resigned, he should still be held accountable for not providing the necessary oversight at such a momentous time.

As the only shareholder, the government is also complicit. As the shareholder representative the minister of public enterprises had the responsibility of asking the board questions as part of a consultative process that’s set out in the shareholder compact.

Either the minister wasn’t properly informed or didn’t ask the questions she was entitled to ask, or a mixture of both. This raises red flags about her level of commitment to the shareholder compact.

What does it tell us about the broader political environment?

There’s just too much interference – for nefarious reasons – from outsiders in the running of state owned enterprises. Excessive power and authority is vested in too few people. I often use the analogy of being a sports coach. Imagine a situation where the coach is called to account for his actions every day, where he has no say in who is picked and is told to change the game plan. The situation becomes unmanageable.

Interference undermines the way things should be, erodes confidence and allows conflicts of interest to flourish. This is particularly true when the interference is from people who aren’t acting in the best interests of the team.

But being untouchable is also a recipe for disaster. So we have to find a middle ground. The rules of the game must be established and the parties must carry them out with integrity, competence, responsibility, accountability, fairness and transparency.

These rules of the game are clearly set out in the South African context. Nobody can claim they don’t know what they are. In the case of Eskom they’ve simply been flouted.

What do the events at Eskom tell us about state ownedenterprises in South Africa?

Sadly, state owned enterprises are seen as instruments to serve an elite few rather than fulfilling their broader mandate.

On top of this they aren’t financially viable which means they’ll continue to be a drain on the fiscus. The government must consider partnerships with the private sector. This can be done by selling minority stakes as suggested by former finance minister Pravin Gordhan.

The success of the partly privatised telecommunications entity Telkom supports this view. The company has just posted handsome profits, suggesting it’s a model that could be used to turn around other state owned enterprises, including Eskom.

Disclosure statement

Owen Skae does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.

Uganda: Minister Drags Nakumatt to Court Over Shs 2 Billion Debt

State minister for veterans Bright Rwamirama and wife Florence Rwamirama together with Mpororo Group limited have dragged retailer Nakumatt to court for failing to pay them $569,339 (Shs 2b) in rent.

Rwamirama says in court documents filed at the High Court commercial division on April 12 that Nakumatt has since 2013 not paid him a penny in rent. The retailer was operating its Mbarara branch at Multiplex complex along plot 4, Buremba road.

The suit piles more pressure on the Kenyan retailer that is facing demands from tens of suppliers. In April, the company shut down its Katwe branch over rent arrears. Most of its open branches remain empty as suppliers have stayed away from the troubled firm.

Court documents indicate that prior to Nakumatt renting Rwamirama’s premises, it required the landlord to undertake changes at his own cost to fit specific requirements for the retailer’s business as a precondition for renting the premises.

To make the changes, Rwamirama argues, he borrowed money from Dfcu bank and, also to create additional space within the building, sent some tenants away.

“To date, the defendant [Nakumatt] has neglected to pay for additional space despite the several invoices and constant reminders,” says the Rwamiramas in court documents.

In defence, Bernard Mutua , the Nakumatt Uganda country manager, said that the structural changes in the building were to be carried out at the cost of the landlord.

He notes they had agreed to a three month rent free period which he accuses the plaintiffs of not honoring.

Uganda: Kanungu Leaders Petition Museveni Over Shs18 Billion Tea Debt

Kanungu — Some residents of Kanungu District and their leaders have sought audience with President Museveni, demanding that the government clears an outstanding Shs18b debt owed to tea nursery bed operators who supplied tea seedlings to the National Agricultural Advisory Services (Naads) in 2015.

They also want government to prevail over the constant power outage they say is hurting their businesses, with factories operating on generators. The district has experienced power outage for now five months, a situation they say has disrupted their businesses.

In a meeting chaired by the Kanungu District chairperson, Ms Josephine Katsya, at Kanungu District council hall recently, religious leaders, district councillors, sub-county chairpersons, elders and area Members of Parliament unanimously resolved to petition President Museveni to have their grievances addressed.

The dean of Machuro Catholic Diocese, Fr Paulino Fokushaba, noted the urgent need for the President’s intervention to streamline the tea enterprise, which he said is the backbone for the people of Kanungu.

The chairperson of the tea nursery bed operators in south western, also the district councilllor for Mpungu Sub-county, Mr Frank Byaruhanga, observed that as a result of government’s failure to pay residents who supplied tea seedlings, the farmers have been disempowered.

“… tea famers have not been paid for a long period of time. Most of their seedlings have dried up in the nursery beds and several tea gardens are bushy since the farmers are financially incapacitated,” he said.

However, Dr Samuel K. Mugasi, the Naads executive director, said they are ready to pay all the tea seedlings farmers in Kanungu District as long as claimants have contracts from government to supply tea seedlings to farmers after the verification exercise.

The farmers also want President Museveni to reconcile State minister for Housing, Dr Chris Baryomunsi, with other development partners in the tea enterprise, including Mr James Musinguzi Garuga, whose rivalry they claimed is crippling development in the district.

“The disagreements between Dr Chris Baryomunsi and Mr James Musinguzi Garuga, the lead agent of tea growing in the region, is crippling development in our district as it has resulted into so many court cases over the same and there is need for urgent resolution,” observed Kinkiizi Diocese Bishop Dan Zoreka.

However, in a telephone interview with the Daily Monitor on Tuesday, Dr Baryomunsi dismissed the prelate’s allegations as false, saying this was malicious propaganda.

Asked to comment on the stakeholders petitioning President Museveni to mediate his misunderstandings with Dr Baryomunsi, Mr Garuga, said the matter is already in court and he could, therefore, not comment about it.

The Kinkiizi West MP, Mr James Kaberuka, said he has personally petitioned the authorities at the Uganda Electricity Distribution Company over power outages and they promised to resolve the matter.

Background

Economic activity. Majority farmers in Kanungu District are involved in tea growing, planting seedlings, and picking tea leaves, which they distribute to the three tea processing factories in the district.

Market. About 300 tea nursery bed operators and tea growers supplied 40 million tea seedlings worth Shs18b procured by the district through Naads and Operation Wealth Creation. To date, farmers have not been paid.

Origin. The President launched tea growing in Kanungu District in 2008 after local leaders convinced him that it was the only enterprise that could boost their economy and he pledged commitment by his government to buy all the tea seedlings to be supplied to willing farmers at no cost.

The tea enterprise has for now rolled out to all districts of Kigezi and Ankole sub-region.